Convert To Roth Ira Regardless Of Income ? 2010

An odd quirk in the recent legislation to extend the Bush Tax Cuts is giving IRA holders a huge break. For one year, and one year only, the income cap will be gone.

Convert To Roth IRA Regardless of Income ? 2010

2010 may seem like a long way off, but something magical is going to happen then if you prepare for it. The recent legislation extending the Bush tax cuts contains a unique clause regarding the Roth IRA. Specifically, it contains language that makes the Roth IRA available to anyone regardless of their income, but only for one year.

A Roth IRA is a retirement account that offers a lot of advantages. The primary advantage is found in the distributions from the account. Simply put, they are tax free if a couple of requirements are met. First, the distributions must be made after you pass the age of 59 years and six months. Second, you must have owned the Roth IRA for at least five years. If you meet this test, the money is yours free and clear including all the gains you have made from your investments over the years.

The only criticism of Roth IRAs has to do with income caps. Simply put, a person with a modified gross adjusted income of $100,000 or more cannot convert an existing IRA to a Roth. While many people fall below this income cap, those that were just over it certainly have had a beef.

In an effort to extend his tax cuts, the President agreed to a number of oddities in the new tax legislation. One of the strange clauses is a single year cap exemption. In 2010, the income cap of $100,000 will not apply to the Roth IRA. Put in simple terms, you can convert to a Roth in 2010 regardless of how much you make. You can only do it in 2010, not 2009 or 2011.

There appears to be no reason why the politicians would create a one year exemption to the Roth IRA income cap. It certainly seems a bit fishy, but you might as well take advantage of it. While 2010 seems far off in the future, it gives you time to plan any conversion. Remember, if you convert a traditional IRA to a Roth, you must pay taxes on the moved money. If at all possible, you will want to do this with cash you save between now and then. The more money you can cram into a Roth, the better off you will be in the end.

Read More

What To Do If You Can?t Pay Your Taxes

The end of tax filing extensions is quickly approaching. What do you do if you can?t pay the amounts you owe? You should still file your return by the due date and pay as much as you can. There are, however, additional steps that might help.

Credit Cards

You can charge your taxes on your American Express, MasterCard, Visa or Discover cards. If you go in this direction, you can use either of the following two sources:

Official Payments Corporation
1-800-2PAY-TAX (1-800-272-9829)

Link2Gov Corporation
1-888-PAY-1040 (1-888-729-1040)

If a credit card is out of the question, you may be able to pay any remaining balance over time in monthly installments through an installment agreement. If you are completely wiped out and the future looks grim, you may also want to consider getting the tax amount reduced through the Offer in Compromise program.

To apply for an installment payment plan, fill out and attach Form 9465 to the front of your tax return. The IRS has streamlined the approval process if your total taxes (not counting interest, penalties or other additions) do not exceed $25,000 and can be paid off in five years or less. Be sure to show the amount of your proposed monthly payment and the date you wish to make your payment each month. Make absolutely sure you can make the payments.

The IRS charges a $43 fee for setting up an installment agreement. You will also be charged interest plus a late payment penalty on the unpaid taxes. The late payment penalty is usually one-half of one percent per month or part of a month of your unpaid tax. The penalty rate is reduced to one-quarter of one percent for any month an Installment Agreement is in effect if you filed your return by the due date (including extensions). The maximum failure to pay penalty is 25 percent of the tax paid late.

If you do not file your return by the due date (including extensions), you may have to pay a penalty for filing late. The penalty for failing to file and pay timely is usually five percent of the unpaid tax for each month or part of a month that your return is late. The maximum penalty for failure to file and pay on time is 25 percent of your unpaid tax.

In Closing

The IRS wants you in the system, even if you're broke. Whatever you do, file your tax return in a timely manner. Once filed, the IRS will work with you on payment issues. Don?t get stressed. Keep in mind that millions of Americans have the same problem.

Read More

Irs Continues To Help Hurricane Katrina Victims

The IRS is often bashed as being unfriendly to taxpayers. In many cases, this reputation is deserved. In relation to Hurricane Katrina victims, it is certainly not.

As is well-known by now, the federal government did its best Keystone Cops imitation following Hurricane Katrina. Frankly, the action or lack thereof was disgraceful. It is somewhat ironic given this fact that one government agency acted swiftly, effectively and with common sense to help the victims of the tragedy. To the surprise of many, that agency was the IRS.

You might wonder how the IRS could possibly help those devastated by the hurricane? In a number of ways. The first step taken by the agency was to extend all tax deadlines out by a year or more. The agency also temporarily terminated all federal gas taxes on diesel fuel in an effort to provide relief to the fuel shortage. What many do not understand is some of these 'dirty diesel? taxes effectively bar the use of such fuel by trucks. By waving the tax, the IRS opened up an entirely new fuel source to help get trucks moving again.

The IRS then took the extraordinary step of trying to educate taxpayers on how they could claim their losses from the hurricane on previously filed tax returns by amending those returns. Yes, the IRS effectively taught people how to go back and pull large amounts from their previously filed tax returns and how to do so quickly. This, of course, put money in their pockets within 30 to 60 days, which compares favorably to FEMA and the rest of the federal government efforts.

Two years after Hurricane Katrina, it would be reasonable to expect the IRS to view the events as being at an end. This, of course, would lead to a situation where victims of the hurricane are required to get back on the tax horse if you will. In truth, the IRS continues to show surprising compassion and flexibility.

The agency has just announced it is extending by one calendar year the time victims of Hurricane Katrina have to sell off vacant land and avoid paying a tax on the gains. The normal time period is two years, which is a rather lengthy period. Given the devastation and slow state of reconstruction in the Gulf region, the IRS is displaying what many did not foresee ? compassion. If it continues to take steps like this, it might just ruin its reputation!

Read More

Strategies and Ideas For Dealing With Tax Debts Effective Tax Administration ETA

In today's economic climate more and more individuals and businesses are becoming distressed as it applies to their financial conditions. One of these conditions can be the amount that they owe to the IRS for taxes. However, there are three ways to address taxes owed that will prevent the taxpayer from incurring large penalties and fees because they are under the impression that they lack the ability to pay the tax debt. Each option will be discussed in separate articles.
Most individuals are unaware that a taxpayer can offer a compromise to pay the debt to the IRS. There is a method that individuals can use to settle a debt without incurring penalties and fees, and in some cases lower the taxes paid to the IRS. In the world of the IRS this method is more commonly known as an "offer in compromise" (OIC).
There are three strategies that can be utilized in making an OIC by an individual, they are:
The first strategy that can be used by the taxpayer in making an OIC would be to use the classification of promoting Effective Tax Administration (ETA). This strategy is the most flexible OIC strategy. When using this strategy the individual should be aware that the IRS agents are instructed to use this as a last resort in the process. Despite this, under Treas. Reg. ?? 301.7122-1(b)(3), the IRS is allowed to compromise a tax liability based on ETA if (1) a financial hardship exists; (2) public policy dictates it; or (3) sufficient equitable considerations exist.These multiple elements under ETA make it an attractive alternative for many taxpayers who are looking to settle a tax liability.
1. Financial Hardship:
Under federal regulations, financial hardship exist when the taxpayer is unable to maintain reasonable basic living expenses. In most instances the IRS will then determine the existence of financial hardship by reducing the taxpayer's income by the prescribed national and local expense standards. The taxpayer may argue that the guidelines should be deviated from where the taxpayer can show that they do not apply to that particular situation. The ETA, unlike, other offers can take into account the taxpayer's total circumstances and situation in making an offer in compromise. This option should be used when the amount is substantial and there is no way to make payment without cause hardship to the taxpayer.
2. Public policy argument/Equitable considerations:
These two strategies are generally classified together, and used simultaneously. This is due to the IRS' ability to compromise a liability based on public policy and equitable considerations. If the taxpayer can show that forcing full payment would undermine the public's confidence that the tax laws are being administered in a fair and equitable manner, this option is available. In using these arguments the taxpayer should be aware that there is no available rulings for review, however, the regulations have provided examples to make a case for using this strategy. In one example (Treas. Reg. ?? 301.7122-1(c)(3)(iv), Example 1), the taxpayer suffered a serious illness that required continuous hospitalization for several years and left him unable to manage his financial affairs. Once he recovered, the taxpayer immediately filed his delinquent taxes, and his overall compliance history was not so egregious as to outweigh the justifications for settlement. In another example (Example 2), the taxpayer received written instructions from an IRS employee related to an IRA rollover period, only to discover during an audit that the instructions were incorrect. So, in using this strategy the taxpayer should research the particular situation prior to making an offer.
3. Doubt as to Underlying Tax Liability:
A taxpayer who submits a Doubt as to Underlying Tax Liability (DATL) offer is stating that they disagree with the tax liability or the amount that is owed. Just as any option the DATL has its positives and negative aspects when considering it as an option. The negative is that the DATL cannot be used when the tax issue has been ruled on by a court. The second negative is the procedural aspect of using this option. The procedure has been changed to deny the ability to submit three choices when submitting an OIC. Basically there are more forms to fill out when selecting this as an option.
The positives in using this option is that the taxpayer does not have to reveal extensive amounts of personal financial information. Secondly, the tax courts are more taxpayer friendly when addressing the information before them. This option can be cheaper to the taxpayer as opposed to taking the issue to the tax court. Additionally, the IRS treats a DATL as an audit review, and evaluates the potential cost in addressing this option, which may be more economical to settle than contest.
There are many options for the taxpayer to address a tax liability with the IRS. The above is just one of three that can be utilized by a taxpayer to address their individual tax liability. For more information or assistance in address your tax or legal concerns visit for information on how to address your concerns without the expense of an attorney.

Read More

Innocent Spouse Tax Debt Relief

When someone is attempting to collect money from you, and you still don?t have enough resources to pay what you owe, you will be pressured. Some people even try to escape their problems but what if the IRS is hunting you? Will you still try to hide or escape? When you have to tax debts, you need to find a suitable tax debt relief program to ease your problems.

Oftentimes, it's much better to seek professional help but since this would mean additional cost on the part of the taxpayers, there are always second thoughts about this option. If you look at your situation closely, you can determine if you can solve it on your own. However, if your tax dues involve a large amount, perhaps it's a good idea to find a tax advisor or specialist.

Professionals are confident enough to handle almost any situation. Financial problems encountered by delinquent taxpayers may include levies, wage garnishments, back taxes, liens, etc. By hiring a professional, you can avoid these problems and work out a suitable payment plan or arrangement with the IRS.

When your spouse filed an erroneous tax return without your knowledge, you can request for the Innocent Spouse Relief. There are times when the spouse files an underestimated return. Since you're the wife or the husband, you will also be liable for it. However, if you can prove to the IRS that you have nothing to do with it, and that you just signed the joint return without knowing about the error, you may be exempted from the tax debt.

To make the request, you can work with your lawyer or tax advisor/specialist. You will secure the Form 8857 and fill it out honestly and completely. You can send your request together with the pieces of evidence and your explanation to PO Box 120053 Covington KY 41012.

Next time your spouse files a tax return, you have to make sure that it does not contain any error. The IRS is very strict when it comes to collections of taxes so you have to comply accordingly. Know your tax debt relief alternatives so that you will know what to do.

Read More

The History Of Income Tax

They say death and taxes are the only two certain things in life. Alas, this wasn?t always the case. Well, at least for the income tax.

The History of Income Taxes

Our great nation came into existence in fits and starts. Following the revolt against the British, a federal government was elected and the fun began. This ?fun? inevitably led to the situation where not everyone could agree on what the United States should stand for, much less what laws should be enacted. As a result, there was no federal income tax for nearly 100 years. Ah, the good ole days!

If there was no income tax during this period, you are probably wondering how the government functioned. It did so by collecting use and sales taxes. Taxes were charged on liquor, tobacco and imports to mention just a few. Many people in our modern society would like to return to just such a system.

Contrary to popular notions, the first income tax was not put into law in the early 1900's. In fact, the first President to institute an income tax was Abraham Lincoln. In 1861, President Lincoln and Congress passed an income tax law to assist with funding the Civil War with the south. When the war came to an end, the tax was phased out. Imagine a tax being phased out now? That should bring a tear of laughter to your eye.

The income tax as we know it was first instituted in 1913. Congress passed a law establishing a graduated tax rate of one to seven percent on all income taxes. I can say honestly and truthfully that I would kill to pay one percent in taxes these days. Heck, I am willing to take on the burden of paying seven percent!

In establishing the income tax system, the Constitution was amended to add a 16th Amendment. This Amendment gave the federal government the right to collect taxes. The politicians primarily responsible for this were President Roosevelt and President Taft. I mention two Presidents because the bitter debate over the subject took some time to work out.

If you're looking to blame a particular political party, Presidents Roosevelt and Taft were both Republicans. Of course, the Democrats haven?t exactly made much of an effort to repeal the tax, so both parties deserve a whack upside the head in my opinion. Nonetheless, this is how we came to be burdened by the income tax in the United States.

Read More

Figuring Out Tax Consequences Of Mortgage Debt Forgiveness

To say it has been a rough few years in the housing market is like saying there was a small party in New Orleans after the Saints won the Super Bowl. The housing bubble didn't burst. It blew up like a hydrogen bomb. Unfortunately, this has resulted in many people losing their homes through foreclosure or short sales. Both events have tax consequences.

The pure strangeness of the federal tax code has been commented on repeatedly by many people. Perhaps no where is it stranger than when considering how to handle debt that is forgiven. How so? Well, the tax code is set up in such a way that it considers the relief of debt as...income. Yes, you read that right. If I owe $100,000 on my home and short sell it for $50,000 less than what I owe, I technically have a gain of $50,000 on my income and must pay taxes on it.

Now the government has recognized that most people are in bad shape if they lose their homes. As a result, they've come up with a bit of legislation that helps people avoid the income tax consequences of mortgage debt forgiveness for the years 2007 through 2012. The legislation is known as the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.

The process works fairly simply. You can avoid paying income tax on up to one million dollars in mortgage debt forgiven as a single individual or two million as a married couple. The debt must be applicable to your primary home. It applies to the money used to buy or build the home. It also applies to any refinance debt that was used to improve the home. Refinance money that was used for other purposes is not covered.

To claim the exemption, you need to fill out Form 982. You should also receive a 1099-C from the lender in question. Make sure you check it closely to affirm that the numbers reported are correct.

Read More

Tax Payer Health Account Spending

Health Spending Accounts grow in usage everyday in Canada. It has been believed that in three to five yrs just about all Canadians are going to be using Health Spending Accounts (HSA) to lessen the required taxes they pay and increase the amount of money they've got available, tax-free, to pay for health care costs for themselves as well as for their loved ones.
The expense of utilizing a Health Spending Account, whether it's a Heath & Welfare Trust (HWT) or even a Personal Health Services Plan (PHSP), are considerably less than coughing up the equivalent taxes on those earnings, but they usually are a bit different to comprehend.
When you use your own finances to pay for health care fees (either the expense of your health insurance plan, or the expense that your health insurance policy just doesn't cover), you earn the money, pay the income taxes (at rates as high as 48%), and just use what's left to cover the health care fees. Additionally, it is possible that you might qualify for a rebate called the Medical Tax Credit, then again there is a deductible equal to 3% of your income (so, no credit at all for that amount), and for any amount above that you receive only a tax credit, not a deduction, which means that your benefit is limited to the lowest tax bracket amount inside your province.
A common Canadian family spends between 3 and 7 thousand dollars annually on health care costs. If they are fortunate enough to become covered by a health insurance policy by way of their work, union, or association, they may gain some coverage, but often they have to cover half or much more of the monthly cost of the plan themselves. If you're self-employed, or even a small business owner, you pay the full expense of any health plan membership yourself.
Usually when you use a Health Spending Account, you deposit the whole amount of money (before taxes) to your HSA account. You'll pay an upfront fee of around 10% (possibly less if you are in a larger plan), in addition to GST or HST on the administration fees. There is also a additional tax levied by many provinces - the premium tax. This tax is generally around 2% and is charged on all insurance type products - car insurance, house insurance, life insurance, and Health Spending Account deposits. When all is said and done, your total fee will probably be some where in the 12-14% range, based on your province.
So you now know where the savings originates from! When you are using a Health Spending Account for your family's health care costs, you're choosing to pay for 12-14% (for fees and taxes) as an alternative to gving up up to 48% in income taxes to the Canada Revenue Agency - the savings add up pretty quickly!

Next article: Get Affordable Auto Insurance Quotes Online

Previous article: Here's How You Can Choose A Home Loan Wisely And Save Money

Read More